Insight Line—December 17, 2007

Rob Schumacher    
2008: As I See It

Meet Rob Schumacher

View pdf

 


My forecast for the coming year:

Economic growth in 2008 decelerates but does not enter into a recessionary period.
The current levels of corporate and household balance sheets, in conjunction with total personal and corporate income flows, suggest to me an economy diverse enough to withstand the adverse affects of historically high energy prices and the credit dislocations attributed to housing finance. By year’s end the year-over-year real (inflation adjusted) growth rate should achieve 2.3 percent.

The Federal Reserve Open Market Committee (FOMC) lowers the federal funds rate to 3 percent.
Credit restrictions evident in 2007 persist into early 2008. However, as the key short-term lending rate moves lower, the yield curve markedly steepens thereby reintroducing the opportunity for the financial community to attract money at a rate profitably below prevailing investment opportunities.

Equity investors experience the S&P 500 Index1 climbing past its previous intra-day high of 1567 and perhaps even surpassing 1700.
However, the volatility witnessed in 2007 should again be evident as early gains fade mid-year, only to recover to new highs by year’s end. As an aside, if history is to be any guide, since World War II there has only been one incidence (in 2000) of declining equity returns in a presidential election year. With that said, I consider it of major importance—and central to my forecast—that the S&P 500, as measured by its earnings yield, is as undervalued as it has been since the onset of this current bull market in October 2002.

Relative outperformance by large growth stocks should carry over from 2007 into early 2008.
However, in a surprise resurgence, due in no small part to the FOMC’s continued lowering of short-term interest rates, small and mid-cap value stocks resurface in the second-half of 2008 and outpace their large cap brethren for the full year. As such, I continue to advocate a core position of large cap value stocks while using small and mid-cap stocks as a shorter-term (one-year) tactical strategic overlay. For investors including an international allocation in their equity portfolios, I offer a note of caution. My research leads me to favor dollar stabilization by the end of the first quarter leading to an outright increase its value on world currency markets by year’s-end. If correct, given my position on the relative undervaluation of the U.S. equity market, a disproportionate overweighting to developed international markets is no longer warranted.

Longer-term interest rates (10-year) between 3.5 and 5.3 percent
Influenced by slowing economic growth, FOMC policy and receding inflation expectations, long-term rates remain range bound between 3.5 and 5.3 percent.

What could go wrong?
The “wall of worry” faced by investors always has its bricks, and 2008 will be no exception. Among them will be: energy supply disruptions, an escalation of geopolitical tensions, Congressional and campaign rhetoric on taxes and protectionist trade policy, legal rulings from the Supreme Court (with regard to taxes and 401(k) plans), a major financial bankruptcy, and a drastic slowing of global growth as the Chinese economy responds to increasingly stringent credit conditions.

Additional commentary on my economic and market outlook for 2008 follows the summary in this month’s Factors Driving the Economy and Markets commentary.

1 The Standard and Poor’s 500® Index (S&P 500) is a broad-based index, the performance of which is based on the performance of 500 widely-held common stocks chosen for market size, liquidity and industry group representation. The index does not include any expenses, fees or sales charges, which would lower performance. The index is unmanaged and should not be considered an investment. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

Back to Top

Factors Driving the Economy—and the Markets

If you’re familiar with our "Factors Driving the Economy—and the Markets" flyer, you’ll want to review the chart below.

December 2007 Update    


Factors Driving the Economy

Economic Acceleration

Economic Deceleration

Latest Available Information
(as of 12/14/07

Employment
(Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Up

Down

The release of November 2007’s employment data elicited a sigh of relief from investors worried the economy was taking a turn for the worse. Granted while the data was not spectacular it nevertheless recorded an increase of 94,000 payroll employment thereby moving total payroll employment to a record 138.467 million workers. Growth in the household survey, however, was spectacular. Despite the nation’s labor force expanding by 617,000 the ranks of the employed jumped 696,000 to a record 146.703 million total. As such, the unemployment rate remained at 4.7 percent. That said, the weekly unemployment claims data, in conjunction with anecdotal private business hiring expectation surveys, clearly establish slowing year-over-year hiring patterns. However, hours worked and wage trends do not appear to be confirming a major trend change is underway. Thus, I suggest the appropriate action on the table remains, circling Up.

Personal Income
(Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis)

Up

Down

October 2007 personal income data offered some evidence for those positioning the plight of a beleaguered consumer. The overall income total did not grow meaningfully from September’s level of $11.8 trillion. On the other hand, for those of us forecasting slowing growth but no recession, the year-over-year growth rate of 6 percent remains a pillar of economic strength and perhaps the strongest argument against the onset of a recession in early 2008. Therefore, I suggest Up remains the appropriate circle on the table.

Retail Sales
(Source: Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau)

Up

Down

November 2007’s retail sales data clearly reflects a strong post-Thanksgiving. The monthly total of $386 billion was at odds with a downbeat consensus forecast. However, the internals of the report suggest high gasoline prices are indeed cutting into the season’s sales as sales at gasoline stations show a disproportionate increase (retail sales measure dollar changes not volume changes). Netting out the increase attributed to gasoline prices reveals the slackening year-over-year trends mentioned last month remains (5.3% vs. 6.2%). All of which suggests that consumers, while not down for the count, are a bit wobbly on their collective feet. I suggest the continued appropriate circle on the chart remains Down.

Durable Goods
(Source: Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau)

Up

Down

Durable goods orders for October 2007 appear to confirm my forecasted drop in economic activity as the fourth quarter gets underway. Granted, manufactured goods did indeed rise; however, manufactured durable goods (those lasting more than three years) declined for the third month in a row. Shipments and inventory data, on the heels of stronger-than-forecast third quarter activity, are once again tracking at lackluster levels. To be sure, strong transportation orders have kept the unfilled orders component at record backlogs (perhaps a harbinger of things to come) and therefore acts as a strong counter-argument for those forecasting an imminent recession in 2008. Nevertheless, the overwhelming evidence, in my opinion, argues for leaving Down as the preferred circle of choice.

Inflation
(Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics)

Low

High

Inflationary pressures remain evident but not elevated. The Federal Reserve’s preferred measure, Personal Consumption Expenditures ex- food and energy price changes, as of October 2007 registered 1.9 percent year-over-year. October’s report marks the fifth month running where core inflation remains within the FOMC’s preferred range of 1 to 2 percent. Therefore, I suggest the appropriate action is to move the circle from High to Low on the chart.

Government Spending
(Source: Congressional Budget Office, U.S. Treasury)

$In

$Out

Despite no formally approved fiscal 2008 budget, the federal government continued to operate within the directives of numerous continuing resolutions. Deficit spending continues to be the order of the day. In fact, the first two months of the fiscal year have indeed produced $20 billion more in red ink than at this time last year. That said, projections for fiscal 2008 balances do grow more difficult each day as officials assess the impact of slowing economic and financial activity. In that a surplus in the current fiscal year is beyond the scope of reality at this point, I believe it appropriate to argue that the federal government continues to stimulate economic activity with deficit expenditures thereby making the appropriate circle on the chart $In.

Monetary Policy
(Source: Board of Governors, the Federal Reserve System)

$In

$Out

The FOMC reduced the overnight lending rate to 4.25 percent on December 11, 2007. Market participants were quick to express concerns that in light of the current financial dislocations in the short-term funding markets the FOMC arguably may be behind the curve. The removal of a balanced assessment of future risks in the monetary policy directive added to investor concerns. As stated last month, I continue to position a high likelihood of an additional rate reductions in the months ahead as the Fed addresses financial market instability. Therefore, please continue to circle $In.

Yield Curve
(Source: Bloomberg, LP)

Positive

Negative

The difference between the three-month Treasury bill yield and the 10-year Treasury note yield was 134 basis points on December 14, 2007. For those following the Federal Reserve’s yield curve analysis the current slope places the probability of recession in the coming 12-months at just 5 percent. This is a dramatic drop from earlier this year, when risks were above thirty percent. Please Circle Positive.

Gross Domestic Product
(Source: Bureau of Economic Analysis)

Above

Below

The nation’s GDP in the third quarter was, as I positioned last month, revised sharply higher from the initial 3.8 percent to 4.9 percent quarter-over-quarter annualized growth. But don’t look for a repeat anytime soon. As pointed out in this commentary, economic growth in the fourth quarter shifted dramatically downward early in the quarter. While I believe recession calls are highly suspect at this point in time, the prospect of slowing growth is all but certain. Therefore, please circle Below.

The Big Picture
As I’ve stated for the past several months, economic growth in the U.S. remains hostage to the unfolding scenario in the nation’s housing and financial markets. The growing prospect of an unintended credit contraction calls into question any forecast of at least trend (3 percent) growth in 2008. It is more likely, given the information at hand, that economic growth, at least in the first half of the year, is little more than 2 percent. The offset to such concerns remains the strength of corporate and household balance sheets. The latest data from the Federal Reserve Board’s Flow of Funds analysis depicts household net worth rising approximately $2.5 trillion dollars over the course of the year. Corporate balance sheet growth over the same period is, in my opinion, equally impressive, showing net worth jumping $1.2 trillion. All of which suggests to me that as the financial system strains to adjust, the underlying strength of the economy pushes on, and all but demands economic expansion in the new year.

My Market Outlook: Rate Cuts Challenge Conventional Thinking on Capitalization and Style Choices in 2008  
The FOMC’s move to lower the overnight federal funds rate to 4.25 percent on December 11, 2007 may yet prove to be too little too late. Mounting losses on securitized mortgage investments—once thought to be of little concern to the vitality of the national economy—are now affecting the availability of credit to all but the most credit-worthy borrowers. The dislocations to the nation’s financial and housing sector have yet to run their course. In fact, the reality of the situation is that educated guesses on the eventual resolution are nothing more than that—guesses. With that said, I am encouraged that FOMC policy moves have resulted in the U.S. Treasury yield curve returning to a positive slope—that is, yields on short rates lower than yields on long rates. You see, if history is any guide, the changing slope of the yield curve due to FOMC policy easing moves characteristically has a net positive effect for both stock and bond returns. In fact, a cursory read of stock market history dating back to 1928 reveals that one-year after the third interest rate cut (December 11) the S&P 500 is on average higher by 14.52 percent. 2

I must admit that my confidence in the S&P 500 Index reaching 1750 in the coming 12 months is indeed shaken, but not broken. I fully appreciate that history has its caveats, such as1929 and 2000 when rate cuts took much longer to have any clear influence on financial returns. Then again, with forward 12-month analyst’s consensus earnings projections for the S&P 500 remaining above $103 I am nervously content to suggest equity valuations weathering the credit storm.

I do differ from the consensus viewpoint, however, with respect to small and mid-cap equity performance and the suggestion of a disproportionate overweight to developed international markets.

My previously published research on small and mid-cap stocks, (in which I concluded small cap stocks could handily outperform large cap stocks during sustained bull markets) relied heavily on market direction and FOMC actions. If indeed a fourth rate cut comes in late January, historical returns since 1978 offer, in my view, a compelling argument against an outsized commitment to large growth stocks. For instance, as previously cited data from Ned Davis Research attests, since 1978 small-cap stocks (as measured by the Russell 2000® Index) have outperformed large-cap stocks (Russell 1000® Index*) by 749 basis points for the one-year period following the fourth rate cut. The outperformance of mid-cap stocks over large caps is slightly less at 656 basis points.3

Style metrics suggest a similarly counterintuitive move as large and small value (as measured by the large cap Russell 1000 growth/value indexes and small cap Russell 2000 growth/value indexes) handily best growth by 1361 and 1781 basis points, respectively. Simply put, the prospect of improving credit conditions and a steepening yield curve appear to argue for considering portfolio strategies counter to the prevailing growth-oriented mindsets.

Obviously, past performance is no assurance of future returns. I merely point out that sometimes the consensus of today overlooks some very important past information.

The fixed income markets asses a steepening yield curve differently. Credit concerns and economic data points work in combination to influence perceived risk and return. In that the asset-backed commercial paper market remains in flux, I suspect all credit spreads to be negatively influenced. With that said, the FOMC’s determination to return the credit markets to normalcy suggests to me little if any upward pressure on interest rates for the remainder of the year or into 2008.

Lastly, I would be remiss not to mention my thoughts on recent developments in the foreign exchange value of the dollar as it sets record lows against the currencies of some our more prominent trading partners. While I do not pretend to have any expertise forecasting the relative movement of currencies, I can offer conjecture based on my previously published research in 2004. Simply put, the recent dollar movements may be strongly linked to the ongoing disruption in the U.S. short-term funding markets. You see, again if history is to be of any value, previous incidences of stress to the U.S. financial system strongly correlate with a decline in the world value of the dollar. However, once the stress subsided the dollar rebounded smartly. Therefore, if the “beginning of the end” of the current financial disruption is underway, I submit that a marked overweight to developed international equity markets in 2008 may be less rewarding than in years past once currency translations (in effect, a stronger dollar) are considered.

This is not to say a globally diversified portfolio is ill advised. A vast of amount of historical performance data would seriously challenge such a conclusion. Rather, I raise the currency issue as note of caution, not a call to action.

The next scheduled edition of the Insight Line is January 8, 2008. Happy Holidays

2 “Stock Market Performance After a Federal Reserve Rate Cut”, 1978 to 12/10/2007, RPT_521.rpt, Ned Davis Research, ©2007. The Russell 1000 Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies (large cap companies) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. The Russell 1000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 1000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000 Value Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies (small cap companies) with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. The Russell 2000 Growth Index is an unmanaged index that measures the performance of those Russell 2000 companies with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The indexes do not include any expenses, fees or sales charges, which would lower performance. The indexes should not be considered an investment. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

3 The Russell 1000 Index is generally representative of the U.S. market for large-capitalization stocks The Russell 2000 Index is a capitalization-weighted index, which is comprised of 2000 of the smallest stocks included in the Russell 3000 Index. The Russell 1000/2000 Growth Index measures the performance of those companies in the Russell 1000/2000 Index with higher price-to-book ratios and higher forecasted growth values. The Russell 1000 /2000Value Index measures the performance of those Russell 1000/2000 Index companies with lower price-to-book ratios and lower forecasted growth values. The indices do not include any expenses, fees or sales charges, which would lower performance. The indices are unmanaged and should not be considered an investment. It is not possible to invest directly in an index.

This material has been prepared using sources of information generally believed to be reliable. No representation can be made as to its accuracy. The forecasts and opinions in this piece are not necessarily those of Van Kampen, and may not actually come to pass. Information in this report does not pertain to any Van Kampen product and is not a solicitation for any product.

Back to Top

Commentary Feeds

How to Subscribe

 

 

 



 

 


Please consider the investment objectives, risks, charges and expenses of the fund(s) carefully before investing. The prospectus contains this and other information about the fund(s). To obtain a prospectus, contact your financial advisor or download and/or order. Please read the prospectus carefully before investing.

Not FDIC Insured—Offer Not Bank Guaranteed—May Lose Value
Not Insured By Any Federal Government Agency—Not A Deposit

Privacy Notice |  U.S.A. Patriot Act | Business Continuity Planning
 
Copyright © Van Kampen Funds Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Parkview Plaza, Oakbrook Terrace, IL 60181
Member FINRA/SIPC.
Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.